Jobs confirms iphone blacklist

As predicted, Steve Jobs has acknowledged what we already knew.

The 2nd gen (3g iphone) does contain code which allows the device to receive a "Black list" of programs which attempt to utilize the location specific function of the iphone.

Hmmmm...is that all?

Jonathan Zdziarski was the guy (Much smarter than me) who found this little bugger and it would be worth taking a look at his site and seeing what he as ACTUALLY said on the subject.

From his description of the software device, I still cannot help but question its true purpose in life.

Zdziarski has broken it down pretty well. I'm paraphrasing, but this is how I interpretted is analysis;
This [software] device is either a form of anti-virus or its Apple's attempt at world domination one handset at a time. (Narf!)

Now, here is my analysis:

Q: Does the company in question have a reputation for being forthcoming?
A: Recently, no. The widespread reception issues have not been addressed at all. The Ipod Classic A/V output issue was something that was quitely marketed at best.

Q: Does the device have the potential to cause great harm to the user?
A: Yes. It can disable programs that are "blacklisted" by Apple. Additionally, it could (EMPHASIS on COULD bc this is only theoretical) be used as a tool for "hackers" to enter the iphone.

Q: Could the presence of the software cause widespread negative publicity?
A: Duh.

Q: Would Apple (Or any company that installs this software) admit that they did wrong by this code?
A: Not likely, can you say lawsuit?

Q: Do any other companies in the same or similar business(s) use these types of "kill switches"
A: Unknown for sure, but I have scanned the feeds in search of comparable situations and none have surfaced in the world of cell phone MANUFACTURERS. Further, even searching under "Carriers" I have not been able to find examples where software can be disabled. Functionality such as web use can be limited, but not more.
A: Examples of situations where this type of program is used is in anti-virus software. HOWEVER, the user must approve the software and its function proactively.

Conclusion,
Apple has limited functionailty and ignored customer complaints regarding product malfuntion. Further, this software COULD cause quite a bit of harm if misused (Or so it would seem). Apple has received negative publicity about this at a time when it is trying to push its newest tech. It is unlikely that Apple would admit to wrongdoing. No other company (that I am aware of) impliments this type of program in cell phones.

To me this means that Apple or any of its "Sources" or spokespeople who defend themselves have a vested interest that reduces their credibility. They are not likely to be truly unbiased.

Further, this whole saga has been embarrasing and no other competitor uses a similar tech. (That I am aware of).

Thus, in my opinion, no matter how much explination or justification is given, Apple got "caught" and is trying to spin its way out of the quagmire.